SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1999 Supreme(SC) 338

J.JAGANNADHA RAO, A.P.MISRA
Sardul Singh – Appellant
Versus
Pritam Singh – Respondent


Order

M. Jagannadhar Rao & A.P. Misra, JJ.-This is an appeal filed by a complainant against orders passed by the Bar Council of India on 27.4.92 in a review petition filed by the first respondent-advocate whereby the review was allowed and the order passed by the Bar Council of India dt. 4.10.1991 was set aside and the order of the Delhi Bar Council dt. 2.5.90 was restored.

2. In this appeal, notice was ordered on 1.11.93 and the first re­spondent was served and he also filed a counter. Thereafter the peti­tioner complaint filed a rejoinder dt. 18.3.94. The matter came up for hearing in this court on 29.1.99 and was heard for considerable time when neither the first respondent nor his counsel Mr. N.S. Bisht were present. After more than an hour and half the said counsel appeared and represented that the file was taken by the first respondent from him two months earlier on the ground that the first respondent wanted to engage another counsel and thereafter no instructions were given to him (Mr. Bisht). In these circumstances, we adjourned the matter and directed fresh notice to the first respondent at house No. 190, first floor, Gautam Nagar, New Delhi and informed him that if he does























Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top