SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1999 Supreme(SC) 347

R.C.LAHOTI, S.P.BHARUCHA
Commissioner Of Income Tax – Appellant
Versus
Sirpur Paper Mills – Respondent


Judgment

Bharucha, J.-In these appeals the question that we are concerned with reads thus :

“Whether on the facts and in the circumstances of the case, the Appellate Tribunal was justified in confirming the order of the Com­missioner of Income-tax (Appeals) that the entire initial contribution made to the superannuation fund is allowable deduction?”

The High Court declined to call for its reference and the Revenue is in appeal. The High Court relied upon its earlier judgment in the case of Hyderabad Asbestos Cement Products Ltd.1. The Revenue had filed a Special Leave Petition against this judgment but it was dismissed on the ground of undue delay.

2. The facts of these appeals are similar. The facts now set out are of Civil Appeal No. 2398 of 1994.

3. The assessee had in the relevant Assessment Year (A.Y. 1981-82) made a contribution to an approved superannuation fund. For the cur­rent year the amount contributed was Rs. 2,70,911/- and for the past five years it was an aggregated amount of Rs. 2,14,785/-, calculated on the basis of 25% of the employees’ dues on account of past service. The Income Tax Officer allowed the deduction only to the extent of 80% of the aggregate contribution



























Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top