SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1999 Supreme(SC) 440

J.JAGANNADHA RAO, UMESH C.BANERJEE
Mishri Lal – Appellant
Versus
Dhirendra Nath – Respondent


Judgment

Banerjee, J.-This appeal is directed against the order of the Madhya Pradesh High Court confirming the preliminary decree passed by the trial Court and allowing the plaintiffs’ claim for redemption in respect of mortgaged houses and khudkasht land.

2. The contextual facts record that the defendant-mortgagee has chal­lenged the right of the plaintiff-mortgagor to redeem assorted items of property which were mortgaged prior to the enactment of the Madhya Bharat Zamindari Abolition Act, 1951 (Samvat 2008). The learned trial judge decreed the suit and the appeal therefrom however before the learned single judge resul­ted in an order of reference before a Division Bench by reason of expression of a view contra, by another Single Judge of Indore Bench in (Yakub son of Kasamji v. Yakub son of Fakir Mohammad & Ors.1).

3. On however a detail analysis of facts it appears that the plain­tiff-respondent being the Zamindar of village Kamalpur, during the subsistence of the Zamindari, executed two mortgage-deeds dated 4.8.1947 and 5-1-1948 in favour of the defendant-appel­lant for securing thereunder a loan against movable property and houses, Zamindari and Khudkhast lands. The possession









































Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top