SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1999 Supreme(SC) 571

S.SAGHIR AHMAD, K.T.THOMAS
Handloom House Ernakulam – Appellant
Versus
Regional Director, Employees State Insurance Corporation – Respondent


JUDGMENT

Thomas, J.-Leave granted.

2. Handloom House is a Co-operative Society engaged in manufacturing and selling handloom fabrics. It disburses to its employees, besides the normal wages, special amounts under two counts. One is "incentive bonus" and the other is "sales commission". Thereupon, the Employees State Insurance Corporation (for short `the Corporation ) demanded from the Handloom House additional contribution towards insurance fund on the premise that such extra benefits given to the employees fall within the ambit of "wages" under the Employees State Insurance Act, 1948 (for short `the Act ). When the Handloom House challenged the said demand before the Employees Insurance Court it was held that such benefits do not form part of wages and hence the demand is unsustainable. The Corporation filed statutory appeal before the High Court of Kerala and a Division Bench thereof quashed the judgment of the Insurance Court and permitted the Corporation to proceed with the demand.

3. The Handloom House, having lost even a motion for review of the said judgment, has filed this appeal by special leave.

4. It was first thought that appellant cannot re-canvass against settled positio


























Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top