SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1999 Supreme(SC) 565

G.B.PATTANAIK, M.SRINIVASAN, N.S.HEGDE
Union Of India – Appellant
Versus
Harish Chandra Goswami – Respondent


Judgment

The respondent herein was commissioned in the Indian Army in 1963 and in due course, was promoted on selection basis as Lieutenant Colonel and worked as Colonel till 7th October, 1989. He was a Commanding Officer in 316 Station Workshop (Maintenance) from 18th December, 1982 to 23rd February, 1986. Certain complaints were sent to the Chief of Army Staff alleging irregularities on the part of the respondent in the local purchase of material for repair. A charge sheet was framed against the respondent setting out as many as eight charges. The details thereof are wholly unnecessary for the purpose of this appeal.

2. The General Court Martial was convened and after trial, the re­spondent was found guilty on 2nd, 3rd, 5th and 7th charges and not guilty on 1st, 4th, 6th and 8th charges. He was awarded the sentence “to be cashiered” and to suffer RI for two years. The said sentence was confirmed by the concerned authority on 26.9.89.

3. The respondent filed Writ Petition before the Delhi High Court challenging the entire Court Martial proceedings as well as the order of punishment. By its judgment dated 28/5/92, the Delhi High Court upheld one of the contentions of the respondent wh














Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top