SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1999 Supreme(SC) 671

1999(5) Supreme 418
Supreme Court of India
(From Karnataka High Court)
Mrs. Sujata V. Manohar, D.P. Mohapatra and R.C. Lahoti, JJ.
N.S. Giri -Appellant
versus
The Corporation of City of Mangalore & Ors. -Respondents
Civil Appeal No. 711 of 1993
Decided on 14-6-1999
Counsel for the Parties :
For the Appellant : S.R. Bhat, Advocate.
For the Respondents : R.S. Hedge, Advocate for K.R. Nagaraja, Advo­cate, Kh. Nobin Singh, Advocate for M. Veerappa, Advocate.

Important point
Any reference by way of industrial dis­pute seeking award of bonus beyond the limits prescribed by law was incompetent.

Headnote:Special Leave Petition-Tamil Nadu District Municipalities Act, 1920-Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 - Section 10-A - Karnataka Municipal Corporation Act, 1976-Section 503(3)(k)-Karnataka Municipalities (Conditions of Service of Officers and Servants) Rules, 1972-Rule 48-Appellant joined services of erstwhile Mangalore Municipality in 1950 as Health Assistant-Promoted as Sanitary Inspector-In 1962-Post re-desig­na­ted as Assistant Health Officer-In 1968 indus­trial dispute between workmen and management of Mangalore City Munici­pality referred to Sole Arbitrator under Section 10A of Industrial Disputes Act, 1947-Dispute was whether age of superannuation of 55 years of employee of Mangalore City Municipality including those whose services extended or of those who were re-employed after age of fifty years be fixed at 58 years-Arbitrator gave award enhancing age of retirement from 55 years to 58 years-Appellant informed by Karnataka Municipal Corporation that he was to retire with effect from 31-12-1980 having attained age of superannuation of fifty five years-Writ petition-Allowed by single Judge -Order of retirement quash­ed-Appeal by Municipal Corporation to Division Bench-Allowed-SLP-Award dated 11.1.1969 under Section 10A of I.D. Act appointing age of retirement at 58 contrary to provision of statutory rules appointing age of retirement of fifty-five-Cannot be upheld-Award stood superseded by subsequent statutory rules of 1974-Nothing wrong in appellant having been asked to superannuate at age of 55 consistently with service rules as applicable.

       Held : We are of the opinion that the award dated 11.1.1969 under Section 10A of the I.D. Act appointing the age of retirement at 58, contrary to the provisions of the statutory rules appointing the age of retirement at 55, cannot be upheld and given effect to by issuing a writ for its implementation. In any case, the award stood superseded by the subsequent statutory rules of 1974 which too appointed the age of retirement at 55 and there is nothing wrong in the appel­lant having been asked to superannuate at the age of 55 consistently with the service rules as applicable on that day. (Para 12)

       

Judgment

R.C. Lahoti, J.-The facts relevant for the purpose of deciding this appeal are undisputed and are briefly set out hereafter. N.S. Giri, the appellant joined the services of erstwhile Mangalore Municipali­ty as a Health Assistant in the year 1950. He was promoted as Sanitary Inspector in the year 1962 and as a Selection Grade Sanitary Inspector with effect from 1.6.1967. The post has been re-designated as Assist­ant Health Officer. The Mangalore City Municipality was constituted under the then Madras District Municipalities Act, 1920 (renamed in the year 1969 as The Tamil Nadu District Municipalities Act, 1920).

2. In the year 1968, an industrial dispute between the workmen and the management of Mangalore City Municipality was referred to a sole arbitrator under Section 10A of Industrial Disputes Act, 1947. The dispute referred to was : whether the age of superannuation of 55 years of the employees of Mangalore City Municipality including those whose services were extended or of those who were re-employed after the age of 50 years should be fixed at 58 years. The arbitrator gave an award on 11.1.1969 (published in the Mysore Gazette dated 13.2.1969) enhancing the age of retirement of the workmen belonging to the ‘superior service’ from 55 years to completion of 58 years of age including those whose services were extended or who were re-employed after the age of 55 years. The admitted case of both the parties as noted in the award itself has been that the workmen (in­cluding the appellant) whose dispute was before the arbitrator were classified as superior servants and under the statutory service rules as then applicable the age of superannuation was 55 years. However, the arbitrator had thought it fair to fix the age of superannuation at 58 years. Consistently with such opinion formed by the arbitrator the award was given.

3. On 31.12.1980 the appellant received a communication from the Karnataka Municipal Corporation, informing the appellant that he was to retire with effect from 31.12.1980 (afternoon) in view of his having attained the age of superannuation, i.e., 55 years. On 17.1.1981, the appellant filed a writ petition which was allowed by the learned Single Judge quashing the order of retirement forming an opinion that the award was binding between the parties. The Municipal Corporation preferred an appeal before the Division Bench of Karnataka High Court which has been allowed reversing the judgment of the learned Single Judge. The Division Bench has formed an opinion that the award to the extent to which it was inconsistent with the statuto­ry provisions governing the service conditions of the appellant, including the age of retirement could not be given effect to. The aggrieved appellant has filed this appeal by special leave.

4. As noted by the Division Bench in its judgment it has been the admitted case of the parties also before the High Court that Mangalore City Municipality was constituted under the provisions of the then Madras District Municipalities Act under which rules were framed which provided for the retirement of persons in superior service such as the appellant, at the age of 55 years. The Karnataka Municipalities Act, 1964 came into force w.e.f. 1st April, 1965. The Mangalore City Municipality was deemed to have been constituted under the Karnataka Act. Then came into force the Karnataka Municipal Corportation Act, 1976. In exercise of powers conferred by Section 3 thereof, Mangalore City was declared a Corporation and all the employees of the erst­while Municipality were deemed to be in service of the Municipal Corporation. Rule 48 of the Karnataka Municipalities (Conditions of Service of Officers and Servants) Rules, 1972 which governed the employees such as the appellant, also prescribed for the age of super­annuation being 55 years. In spite of the formation of the Corpora­tion, by virtue of clause (k) of sub-section (3) of Section 503 of the Karnataka Municipal Corporation Act, 1976 the













Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top