SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1999 Supreme(SC) 764

A. S. ANAND, N. S. HEGDE, J. JAGANNADHA RAO
East City Defence Personnel Welfare Association – Appellant
Versus
State Of A. P. – Respondent


Judgment

M. Jagannadha Rao, J.-Leave granted.

2. This appeal has been preferred by the appellant-association-which consists of defence personnel-against the judgment of the Division Bench of the Andhra Pradesh High Court in W.A.No. 1251/97 dated 2.3.98 whereby the judgment of the learned Single Judge in W.P. No. 6468/97 dated 29.7.97 was affirmed. In this appeal, the appellant-association is aggrieved by the judgment of the learned Single Judge as affirmed by the division Bench to the extent that the court enabled 5th re­spondent (Andhra Pradesh Bhoodan Board) to act as receiver in regard to the properties which are the subject matter of the writ petition.

3. For the purpose of understanding the dispute in this appeal, it is necessary to refer briefly to the various proceedings taken out by the parties earlier namely, O.S. 238/89, pending before the IInd Addition­al Judge, City Civil Court, Hyderabad, judgment dated 3.12.92 of the learned Single Judge of the High Court of Hyderabad in W.P. 9211/90, judgment of another learned Single Judge of the High Court dated 29.1.97 in W.P. 8280/95, W.P. 22745/94 which is said to be pending in the High Court and finally the judgment dated 29.7.97
































Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top