SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1999 Supreme(SC) 834

N.S.HEGDE, R.C.LAHOTI, S.P.BHARUCHA
Collector Of Central Excise, Pune – Appellant
Versus
Dai-ichi Karkaria LTD. – Respondent


Judgment

Bharucha, J.-It is convenient to set out, at the outset, the question involved in these appeals.

2. The manufacturer purchases raw material. He uses the raw material in the maunfacture of an intermediate product. He then uses the in­termediate product in the manufacture of a final product. The raw material and the intermediatae product are liable to excise duty and they are specified goods for the purposes of the Modvat scheme. The assessable value of the intermediate product for the purposes of excise duty has, it is agreed in the instant case, to be determined on the basis of its cost. In determining the assessable value of the intermediate product the cost of the raw material has to be taken into account. The question is : is part of the cost of the raw material the price paid byteh manufacturer to its seller, as contended by the Revenue, or is it the price of the raw material less the excise duty thereon, which has been paid by the seller and for which the manufac­turer is intitled to credit under the Modvat scheme, to be utilised against the payment of excise duty on products manufactured by him, including the intermediate product, as contended by the manufacturer.

3. Th

























































































Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top