SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1999 Supreme(SC) 427

S.B.MAJMUDAR, V.N.KHARE
Sneha Dutta – Appellant
Versus
Himachal Road Transport Corporation – Respondent


ORDER

1. Leave granted.

2. We have heard learned counsel for the parties.

3. In our view, the appropriate award of compensation to the heirs of the deceased who died during a motor accident would work out at least up to Rs. 4 lakhs in all instead of Rs. 2,75,000 as awarded by the High Court by reducing the figure of Rs. 5,60,000 as awarded by the trial Court. The reason is obvious. The appellants breadwinner who died because of the unfortunate accident, was drawing a monthly salary of Rs. 4000 as held by the Tribunal. Even deducting an amount of Rs. 1500, Rs. 2500 would have been the economic benefit available to the heirs of the deceased and if the deceased had survived the rest of the earning career, he would have made available to his dependants at least Rs. 5000 per month. Adding Rs. 5000 to Rs. 2500 the total would work out to Rs. 7500. Reducing it to 1/2 over the years the average economic loss to the dependants would work out to Rs. 3500 per month and even deducting Rs. 500 therefrom as personal expenses of the deceased, Rs. 3000 would have been available to the appellants per month and multiplying by 12 the annual economic benefit would work out at Rs. 36,000 and considering






Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top