S.SAGHIR AHMAD, R.P.SETHI
Ajitkumar Rath – Appellant
Versus
State Of Orissa – Respondent
JUDGMENT
S. Saghir Ahmad, J.-Appellant, who held a Degree in Engineering, was appointed as an Overseer on 23.3.1965 in the Subordinate Engineering Service which is governed and regulated by the Orissa Service of Engineer Rules, 1941 (for short, the Rules ). There were many other Overseers who were only Diploma-holders. On and from 1.5.1965, the appellant was redesignated as Junior Engineer to distinguish him from other members of the Subordinate Engineering Service who were only Diploma-holders. It was, according to him, merely a functional designation. In spite of this designation, he was still described and designated as Subordinate Asstt. Engineer in the order dated 12.5.1969 by which he was transferred. The Overseers in the State of Orissa, are, undisputedly, known as Subordinate Asstt. Engineer.
2. On 7.8.1972, appellant, along with a number of other officers, was promoted as Asstt. Engineer (Civil) and ad hoc basis. Since the posts of Asstt. Engineer (Civil) were within the purview of the Orissa Public Service Commission, it was indicated in the order of promotion that the promotion was for a period of six months or till the receipt of concurrence of the Orissa Public Servic
Shri L. Chandrakishore Singh v. State of Manipur & Ors.
Direct Recruit Class-II Engineering Officers Association & Ors. v. State of Maharashtra & Ors.
Jagdish Ch. Patnaik & Ors. v. State of Orissa & Ors.
State of West Bengal & Ors. v. Aghore Nath Dey & Ors.
Keshav Dev & Anr. v. State of U.P. & Ors. (1999) 1 SCC 280 : Relied on. (Para 27)
V. Srinivas Reddy & Ors. v. Govt. of Andhra Pradesh & Ors.
V.P. Shrivastava & Ors. v. State of M.P. & Ors.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.