SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
BEFORE J.S. VERMA, P.B. SAWANT AND N.M. KASLIWAL, JJ.
Civil Appeal No. 3607 of 1988
STATE OF W.B. AND OTHERS
Versus
AGHORE NATH DEY AND OTHERS.
With
Civil Appeal No. 3608 of 1988
STATE OF W.B. AND OTHERS
Versus
BISWANATH GHOSH AND OTHERS.
And
Civil Appeal No. 3609 of 1988
STATE OF W.B. AND OTHERS
Versus
MAJHARUL ISLAM KHAN AND OTHERS.
And
Civil Appeal No. 3610 of 1988
ASHOKE KUMAR ROY CHOUDHARY AND OTHERS
Versus
AGHORE NATH DEY AND OTHERS .
And
Civil Appeal No. 3611 of 1988
DEB NATH DAS AND OTHERS
Versus
BISWANATH GHOSH AND OTHERS.
Civil Appeal Nos. 3607-11 of 1988 {From the Judgment and Order dated July 12, 1988 of the Calcutta High Court in F.M.A.T. Nos. 2301, 2326 and 2327 of 1986}
Decided on 2-4-1993
Advocates appeared:
Tapas Ray, Dr Shankar Ghosh and B. Dutta, Senior Advocates (H.K. Puri, S.K. Nandy, Sushil Kr. Jain and R.K. Joshi, Advocates, with them) for the Appellants; G.L. Sanghi, Senior Advocate (N.R. Chowdhary, Som Nath Chatterjee, Advocates, with him) for the Respondents.
Relating to the Irrigation and Waterways Department – Appeals involve for decision a common question, relating to fixation of seniority of certain Sub-Assistant Engineers appointed ad hoc temporary Assistant Engineers for a specified period in the PWD and the Irrigation and Waterways Department of the Government of West Bengal, vis-a-vis the direct recruits in the cadre of Assistant Engineers appointed regularly according to rules in these departments prior to the regularisation of the ad hoc appointees – Question was raised by the ad hoc appointees who were regularised subsequently, by filing writ petitions in the Calcutta High Court claiming revision of their seniority, reckoned from the date of their initial ad hoc appointment – These writ petitions were dismissed by a single bench of the High Court but the writ appeals were allowed by a division bench, resulting in grant of the relief claimed by the ad hoc appointees –Held, In such cases, the deficiency in the procedural requirements laid down by the rules has to be cured at the first available opportunity, without any default of the employee, and the appointee must continue in the post uninterruptedly till the regularisation of his service, in accordance with the rules – In such cases, the appointee is not to blame for the deficiency in the procedural requirements under the rules at the time of his initial appointment, and the appointment not being limited to a fixed period of time is intended to be a regular appointment, subject to the remaining procedural requirements of the rules being fulfilled at the earliest – In such cases also, if there be any delay in curing the defects on account of any fault of the appointee, the appointee would not get the full benefit of the earlier period on account of his default, the benefit being confined only to the period for which he is not to blame – This category of cases is different from those covered by the corollary in conclusion (A) which relates to appointment only on ad hoc basis as a stopgap arrangement and not according to rules – Appeals are allowed.
JUDGMENT
VERMA, J.—These appeals involve for decision a common question, relating to fixation of seniority of certain Sub-Assistant Engineers appointed ad hoc temporary Assistant Engineers for a specified period in the PWD and the Irrigation and Waterways Department of the Government of West Bengal, vis-a-vis the direct recruits in the cadre of Assistant Engineers appointed regularly according to rules in these departments prior to the regularisation of the ad hoc appointees. The question was raised by the ad hoc appointees who were regularised subsequently, by filing writ petitions in the Calcutta High Court claiming revision of their seniority, reckoned from the date of their initial ad hoc appointment. These writ petitions were dismissed by a single bench of the High Court but the writ appeals were allowed by a division bench, resulting in grant of the relief claimed by the ad hoc appointees. It is these judgments, involving the common question of the merit of the claim of the ad hoc appointees for seniority, reckoned from the date of their initial ad hoc appointment, in the facts and circumstances of the case, which are challenged in these appeals.
2. Civil Appeal No. 3607 of 1988 is by the State of West Bengal while Civil Appeal No. 3610 of 1988 is by the adversely affected direct recruits who were respondents in the writ petition filed by the ad hoc appointees in the PWD. Civil Appeal No. 3608 of 1988 is by the State of West Bengal while Civil Appeal No. 3611 of 1988 is by the adversely affected direct recruits who were respondents in the writ petition filed by the ad hoc appointees in the Irrigation and Waterways Department. Civil Appeal No. 3609 of 1988 is a similar matter, also relating to the Irrigation and Waterways Department.
3. The material facts are only a few, and may be stated with reference to the PWD, pointing out the minor difference on facts between the ad hoc appointments made in the PWD and Irrigation and Waterways Department, which are not significant on the conclusion reached.
4. In exercise of the powers conferred by the proviso to Article 309 of the Constitution of India, the Governor of West Bengal made Rules by Notification No. 94 dated August 20, 1959 for the regulation of recruitment to the Engineering Services under the Department of Works and Buildings of the Government of West Bengal. In the present case, we are concerned with the cadre of Assistant Engineers, for which the relevant rules are:
"Rule 4:
There will be an examination held by the Public Service Commission, West Bengal, for recruitment to posts of Assistant Engineer. A certain proportion of such posts as may be determined by the Works and Buildings Department from time to time, will be filled up by candidates, in order of merit, who will be given a higher initial pay of Rs 325 per month in the time-scale of pay for Assistant Engineers. In order to be eligible for such higher initial pay a candidate must secure 66 per cent or above of the total marks in the said examination.
Rule 9:
Recruitment to the permanent posts of Assistant Engineer shall be made as follows:
(a) Forty per cent of vacancies by direct recruitment on the results of a competitive examination to be conducted by the Public Service Commission, West Bengal, as mentioned in Rule 4 supra.
Qualifications :
(i) A degree in Civil Engineering of a recognised University or any other qualification in Civil Engineering exempting a candidate from appearing in Sections A and B of Associate Membership Examination of the Institute of Engineers (India).
(ii) One years post graduate practical training or study or research or practical engineering experience.
(iii) Age not more than 27 years on the 1st August of the year in which the recruitment examination is held.
The age limit shall in the case of candidates who have been in the employ of the Central or the State Government or of the Damodar Valley Corporation or any other statutory body recognised for the purpose by the Government and are not
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.