SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2000 Supreme(SC) 538

RUMA PAL, D.P.WADHWA
Siv Industries LTD. – Appellant
Versus
Commissioner Of Central Excise And Customs – Respondent


JUDGMENT

D.P. Wadhwa, J.-This appeal is directed against the order dated November 5, 1997 of the Customs, Excise and Gold (Control) Appellate Tribunal (for short the Tribunal ) allowing the appeal of the respondent and directing that duty of Central Excise was payable under Section 3(1) of the Central Excise and Salt Act, 1944 (for short the Act ) and not under proviso to Section 3(1) of the Act as claimed by the appellant.

2. Section 3(1) of the Act with proviso, in relevant part, is as under :- "Section 3. Duties specified in the Schedule to the Central Excise Tariff Act, 1985 to be levied.-(1) There shall be levied and collected in such manner as may be prescribed duties of excise on all excisable goods other than salt which are produced or manufactured in India and a duty on salt manufactured in, or imported by land into, any part of India as, and at the rates, set forth in the Schedule to the Central Excise Tariff Act, 1985 :

Provided that the duties of excise which shall be levied and collected on any excisable goods which are produced or manufactured,-

(i) in a free trade zone and brought to any other place in India; or

(ii) by a hundred p


































































Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top