SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2000 Supreme(SC) 744

S.S.M.QUADRI, D.P.WADHWA
V. M. Salgaocar And Brothers Private LTD. : Commissioner Of Income Tax, Karnataka – Appellant
Versus
Commissioner Of Income Tax: Shivanand V. Salgaocar – Respondent


JUDGMENT

D.P. Wadhwa, J.-Civil Appeal No.657 of 1994 is directed against the judgment dated February 7, 1992 of the Division Bench of the Karnataka High Court (now reported as (1992) 198 ITR738) delivered on Reference made to it by the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ( Appellate Tribunal for short) under Section 256(2) of the Income Tax, 1961 (for short, the Act ) Reference was at the instance of Revenue. Following questions arose for the determination of the High Court :

(1) Whether on the facts and in the circumstances of the case the Appellate Tribunal is right in law in deleting addition of Rs.5,21,241 made by the Income Tax Officer under Section 40A(5) and sustained by the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals)?

(2) Whether on the facts and in the circumstances of the case the Appellate Tribunal is right in law in holding that non-charging of interest on the debit balance in the running account of the directors would not constitute a perquisite?"

High Court answered both the questions in negative and in favour of the Revenue. The assessee, a Company, felt aggrieved and sought leave to appeal under Article 136 of the Constitution which was granted.





























































Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top