SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2000 Supreme(SC) 830

Veera Hanuman Rice And Flour Mill – Appellant
Versus
State Bank Of India, Ramachandrapuram, A. P. – Respondent


ORDER

Special leave granted.

2. The plaintiff-Bank filed a suit against the defendants (appellants herein) in O.S. No. 93 of 1987 on the file of the Senior Civil Judge, Ramachandrapuram, Andhra Pradesh, and obtained a preliminary decree on 31.12.87 for a sum of Rs. 70,087.75. The decree holder ought to have filed an application for passing a final decree in case of default on the part of the judgment-debtors on or before 31.12.91, but actually filed in application on 27.7.94 for passing a final decree invoking Order 34 Rule 5, CPC, along with an application under Section 5 of the Limitation Act, 1963 seeking for the condonation of delay of 714 days. It may be pointed out at this stage that on the filing of the suit, the judgment-debtors filed an Insolvency Petition in I.P. No. 6/87 and this came to be dismissed on 20.11.92.

3. While dealing with the application for condonation of delay under Section 5 of the Limitation Act made in I.A. No. 1079/94, the learned Subordinate Judge dismissed the same on the view that no sufficient cause had been shown to condone the delay. Aggrieved, the Bank pursued the matter before the High Court in a revision, C.R.P. No. 610/98. A learned Single Judge








Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top