2000 Supreme(SC) 1050
2000(4) Supreme 399
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
(From Calcutta High Court)
S. Saghir Ahmad, Y.K. Sabharwal and S.N. Variava, JJ.
State of Uttar Pradesh -Appellant
versus
The Banaras Electricity Light & Power Co. Ltd. & Ors. -Respondents
Civil Appeal No. 5959 of 1993
Decided on 12-5-2000
Counsel for the Parties :
For the Appellant : D. Sen, Sr. Advocate, Pradeeep Mistra, T. Mahipal, Advocates.
For the Respondents : Dr. A.M. Singhivi, Sr. Advocate, Ms. Meera Mathur, Advocate for M/s. J.B.D. & Co., Advocates.
For State of U.P. : A.B. Rohtagi, Sr. Advocate, R.C. Verma Advocate.
Headnote:Indian Electricity (U.P. Amendment and Validation) Act, 1976-Sections 6 and 7A-Constitution of India -Articles 19(1)(f), 31(2), 39(b) and 31C-Purchase of undertaking-Compensation -Determination of-Notice under Section 6 to licensee to sell undertaking given-Subsequent amendment of Sections 6 and 7A-Method of valuation changed from market value to Book value-Challenge on ground right to compensation already crystalised and amendment acquiring chose in action and extinguishing rights which had already accrued-Untenable-Amendment Act has nexus with principles in Article 39(b) and protected by Article 31C-What was acquired was material resources of community -Provision for payment of amount to undertaking by reducing market value to book value formed an integral part of nationalisation scheme-Amendment valid. (Paras 8 to 11)
JUDGMENT
S.N. Variava, J.-This Civil Appeal is against the Judgment dated 11th January, 1989 delivered by a Division Bench of the Calcutta High Court. By this Judgment the Division Bench dismissed the Appeal filed by the Appellant against a Judgment of a learned single Judge of the Calcutta High Court which upheld the challenge of the 1st Respondent to Ordinances and Amendment Act set out hereinafter.
2. Briefly stated the facts are as follows :
On 6th February, 1925 the Government of Uttar Pradesh granted to one M/s. Martin & Co. a licence for supply of electric energy. This licence was subsequently transferred to the 1st Respondent. One of the terms of the licence was that at the end of the licence period the Government had a right to purchase the undertaking. The licence was for a period of 50 years. The 50 years period would thus end on 5th February, 1975. On February 1, 1974 the Appellant served a notice on the 1st Respondent, under Section 6(1) of the Indian Electricity Act 1910 (hereinafter called the said Act). By this the Appellants called upon the 1st Respondent to sell the undertaking to the Appellant on the expiry of the period of 50 years from the commencement of the licence, i.e., at 12 O clock in the night between the 5th and 6th February, 1975.
3. On February 4, 1975, Indian Electricity (U.P. Amendment and Validation) Ordinance No.7 of 1975 was passed. This Ordinance amended certain provisions of the Indian Electricity Act. Subsequently this Ordinance was replaced by an Act namely Indian Electricity (U.P. Amendment and Validation) Act, 1976. The Ordinance and the Act amended against others Sections 6 and 7-A of the Indian Electricity Act.
4. At this stage it is necessary to see what the unamended Sections 6 and 7-A provided for. They read as follows :
"6. Purchase of undertakings.-(1) Where licence has been granted to any person, not being a local authority, the State Electricity Board shall,-
(a) in the case of a licence granted before the commencement of the Indian Electricity (Amendment) Act, 1959 (32 of 1959), on the expiration of each such period as is specified in the licence; and
(b) in the case of a licence granted on or after the commencement of the said Act, on the expiration of such period not exceeding thirty years and of every such subsequent period, not exceeding twenty years, as shall be specified in this behalf in the licence;
have the option of purchasing the undertaking and such option shall be exercised by the State Electricity Board serving upon the licensee a notice in writing of not less than one year requiring the licensee to sell the undertaking to it at the expiry of the relevant period referred to in this sub-section.
(2) Where a State Electricity Board has not been constituted, or if constituted, does not elect to purchase the undertaking, the State Government shall have the like option to be exercised in the like manner of purchasing the undertaking.
(3) Where neither the State Electricity Board nor the State Government elects to purchase the undertaking, any local authority constituted for an area within which the whole of the area of supply is included shall have the like option to the exercised in the like manner of purchasing the undertaking.
(4) If the State Electricity Board intends to exercise the option of purchasing the undertaking under this section, it shall send an intimation in writing of such intention tothe State Government at least eighteen months before the expiry of the relevant period referred to in sub-section (1) and if no such intimation as aforesaid is received by the State Government the State Electricity Board shall be deemed to have elected not to purchase the undertaking.
(5) If the State Government intends to exercise the option of purchasing the undertaking under this section, it shall send an intimation in writing of such intention to the local authority, if any, referred to in sub-section (3) at least fifteen months before the