SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2000 Supreme(SC) 104

UMESH C.BANERJEE, G.B.PATTANAIK
Shailendra Kumar – Appellant
Versus
State Of Delhi – Respondent


ORDER

Leave granted.

2. This is a petition for being released on bail while the appellant-applicant s appeal against his conviction under Sections 304-B and 498-A IPC is pending in the High Court of Delhi. The appellant-applicant has been sentenced to 7 years rigorous imprisonment under Section 304-B and two years rigorous imprisonment under Section 498-A IPC.

3. Having heard the learned counsel for the parties and taking into account the fact that the appellant-applicant is in custody for more than three years and there is no likelihood of appeal being heard early, we direct that the appellant-application be released on bail to the satisfaction of the Additional Sessions Judge, New Delhi.

4. The appeal stands allowed accordingly.

(C.R.) Appeal allowed.

***************

Parallel Citations of other Journals :

Shailendra Kumar v. State of Delhi, 2000(4) Supreme 715 : 2000 (1) JT 184 : 2000 (2) Cur. Crl. R. 42 : (2000) 4 SCC 178 : 2000 SCC (Crl.) 795 : 2000 Crl. L.J. 2452 : 2000 (3) Crimes 67

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top