SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2000 Supreme(SC) 1076

J.JAGANNADHA RAO, D.P.MOHAPATRA
Chandigarh Housing Board – Appellant
Versus
Narinder Kaur Makol – Respondent


JUDGMENT

Leave granted.

2. This appeal is preferred by the Chandigarh Housing Board against the judgment of the National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission, New Delhi in R.P.No. 1469 of 1997 dated 29.4.1999.

3. A commercial plot was allotted to the husband of the respondent on 4.4.1979 by the Notified Area Committee, Union Territory of Chandigarh, on free hold basis in the Motor Market and Commercial Complex at Manimajra, by the appellant.

4. Para 8(a) of the said allotment order stated that the allottee should complete the building in accordance with the sanctioned plan which shall be according to the control sheets prepared by the Chief Architect and Secretary of the Board. Thereafter, the Administrator issued a letter on 9.7.93 to the respondent s husband that the procedure relating to preparation of Architectural Control Sheets for Shop-Flats are applicable for Motor Shops also and that in these cases the said procedure of Architectural Control permits the construction of shops on the ground floor and flats on the first and second floor. On the basis of the above said order, the respondent s husband submitted the Plan to the Architect for construction of a ground floor for comm





















Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top