SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2000 Supreme(SC) 1298

N.S.HEGDE, S.P.BHARUCHA, S.S.M.QUADRI
K. Ramullan – Appellant
Versus
Commissioner Of Income Tax, Cochin – Respondent


JUDGMENT

Syed Shah Mohammed Quadri, J.-The short point that arises for consideration in these appeals is : whether the appellant-assessee is a resident outside India as defined in Section 2(q) of the Foreign Exchange Regulation Act, 1973?

2. These appeals arise from the common order of the High Court of Kerala at Ernakulam passed in Income Tax Reference Nos. 109 and 113-114 of 1992 dated September 10, 1996. The questions referred to the High Court in those cases were under the Income Tax Act as well as the Wealth Tax Act. Being of the view that the second question in I.T.R. No. 109 of 1992, viz., "Whether, on the facts and in the circumstances of the case, the Tribunal is right in law in holding that the assessee is entitled to exemption of the interest earned on the deposits in Non-resident (External) Account in terms of Section 10(4A) of the Income-tax Act, 1961?", is germane and would cover all the other questions referred to it, the High Court dealt with the answered that question by the impugned common order in the negative, i.e., in favour of the Revenue and against the assessee.

3. The appellant, though of Indian origin, has settled down in Malaysia in 1941 and acquired Malaysi



















Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top