SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2000 Supreme(SC) 779

S.N.PHUKAN, S.RAJENDRA BABU
K. S. Muthu – Appellant
Versus
T. Govindarajulu – Respondent


ORDER

Leave granted.

2. A suit for specific performance was decreed on August 30, 1997 and the Appellant was granted one week s time to deposit the balance of sale consideration in the Court and the last date for depositing the said amount was September 6, 1997. It is stated that September 5, 1997 was declared to be a holiday and September 6/7, 1997 being Saturday and Sunday were again general holidays and in these circumstances the Appellant made an application to permit him to deposit the amount on September 8, 1997. The trial Court declined to grant permission to deposit the amount on September 8, 1997 by stating that the Appellant ought not to have waited till the last date; that if really he had money in his hands, he would have deposited within the four days and not having done so he cannot seek indulgence of the Court now. On that basis the trial Court rejected the application for extension of time.

3. A Revision petition was filed but the High Court declined to interfere with the order made by the trial Court and rejected the said petition, hence this appeal.

4. On February 25, 2000 when this matter came up for hearing before us, we directed that the Appellant shall deposit the





Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top