SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2000 Supreme(SC) 1619

D.P.MOHAPATRA, S.RAJENDRA BABU
Hindustan Machin Tools – Appellant
Versus
M. Rangareddy – Respondent


JUDGMENT

D.P. Mohapatra, J.-The Hindustan Machines Tools Ltd. (hereinafter referred to as HMT Ltd. ), represented by its Chairman-cum-Managing Director at Bangalore and the General Manager and the Joint General Manager (Personnel Incharge) at Bali Nagar, Hyderabad have filed these appeals by special leave challenging the judgment dated 9th November, 1995 of the Single Judge of the Andhra Pradesh High Court in Writ Petition No.3425 of 1995, which was confirmed in appeal by a Division Bench of that Court by its Order dated 28th December, 1995 in Writ Appeal No.1710 of 1995.

2. HMT Ltd. is a Public Sector Undertaking of the Government of India which, as described by the appellants, has grown into a multi-unit, multi-product, multi-technology Company having four business groups and 20 manufacturing units spread over ten different States in the country. The Company engages casual workers on daily rate basis depending upon the need and exigencies of work. Forty two such casual workers engaged in the unit of the Company at Hyderabad filed the Writ Petition with a prayer to issue a Writ or Order or Direction in the nature of a Writ of Mandamus directing the respondents to regularise their s




















Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top