SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2000 Supreme(SC) 974

K.T.THOMAS, R.P.SETHI
Selvi J Jayalalitha – Appellant
Versus
State By Deputy Supdt. Of Police, Chennai – Respondent


ORDER

Permission to file Special Leave Petition is granted.

2. Leave granted.

3. Appellant is the 1st accused in a criminal case now pending before the XIth Addl. Sessions Judge-II, Chennai. As the prosecution evidence was closed the trial Judge proceeded to question the accused under Section 313 of the Code of Criminal Procedure. On completion thereof the trial Court posted the case for defence evidence on 29.3.2000. As the appellant did not produce any defence evidence nor presented any list of defence witnesses the trial Court posted the case again to 11.4.2000. On that day also the appellant did not produce any defence witness not any list of witnesses to be examined on the defence side. It was hence posted on the next day i.e. 12.4.2000 for the same purpose. As nothing happened on that day also the trial Court chose to close the evidence for defence and posted the case for arguments. In the meanwhile appellant filed an application for recalling some of the witnesses already examined for the prosecution, under Section 311 of the Code of Criminal Procedure (hereinafter referred to as the Code ). The trial Court did not find the necessity for recalling such witnesses for a just dec














Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top