SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2000 Supreme(SC) 1038

K.T.THOMAS, R.P.SETHI
Jayanmti De – Appellant
Versus
Abani Kanta Barat – Respondent


ORDER

Leave granted.

2. The appeal has been dismissed by the High Court with the following order :

"This appeal is dismissed under Order XLI Rule 11 of the Code of Civil Procedure.

There will be no order as to costs."

3. We are not satisfied that the High Court has considered the appeal on merits. Even if the dismissal is under Order 41 Rule 11 and the High Court is not required under Sub-rule (4) to record in brief its grounds for doing so it is not a carte blanche to enable the appellate court to avoid recording any reason whatsoever. We think that the appeal required consideration on merits. We, therefore, set aside the impugned order and remit the appeal to the High Court for disposal of the same on merits and in accordance with law by stating the reasons. The position which remained as on the date of impugned order will continue till the disposal of the appeal.

The appeal is disposed of accordingly.

Appeal allowed. Matter remitted.

**************

Parallel Citaions of other Journals :

Jayanmti De and Anr. v. Abani Kanta Barat & Ors., 2000(7) Supreme 76 : 2000 (8) JT 264 : 2000 (4) CCC 146

00024

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top