BRIJESH KUMAR, D.P.MOHAPATRA
Jayalakshmi Coelho – Appellant
Versus
Oswald Joseph Coelho – Respondent
JUDGMENT
Brijesh Kumar, J.-This appeal is preferred against the Judgment and Order dated February 17, 1998 passed by a Division Bench of the Bombay High Court in Letters Patent Appeal No.204 of 1997. The Court of the Principal Judge, Family Court, Bombay, modified its earlier decree which order was challenged by means of a Writ Petition. The Writ Petition was dismissed upholding the order passed by the Principal Judge, Family Court. The impugned order passed by the Division Bench confirmed the order of the learned Single Judge giving cause of grievance to the appellant. Hence, the present appeal.
2. We have heard Ms. Indra Jaising, learned Senior Counsel appearing for the appellant and Shri A.S. Bhasme, learned counsel appearing for the respondent.
3. The appellant Jayalakshmi Coelho and the respondent Oswald Joseph Coelho got married on January 6, 1977 in accordance with the Special Marriage Act, 1954. Out of the said wedlock, a female child Neisha Anne Coelho was born on August 1, 1978. Later, however, differences seem to have arisen between the appellant and her husband, ultimately, culminating into, the parties agreeing for dissolution of their marriage and they entered into an
I.L. Janakirama Iyer & Ors. etc. etc. v. P.M. Nilakanta Iyer
Bhikhi Lal & Ors. v. Tribeni & Ors.
Master Construction Co. (P) Ltd. v. State of Orissa & Anr.
Thirugnanavalli Ammal v. P. Venugopala Pillai
Dwarakadas v. State of M.P. & Anr.
State of Bihar & Anr. v. Nilmani Sahu & Anr.
Bai Shakriben (dead) by Natwar Melsingh & Ors. v. Special Land Acquisition Officer & Anr.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.