SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2001 Supreme(SC) 368

S.N.PHUKAN, S.S.M.QUADRI
Real Optical Company – Appellant
Versus
Appellate Collector Of Customs – Respondent


JUDGMENT

Phukan, J.-This appeal by special leave is directed against the judgment dated 1-7-1986 of the Customs, Excise and Gold (Control) Appellate Tribunal, New Delhi.

2. The question raised in this appeal is whether Rough Ophthalmic Blanks falls under tariff item N0.23-A (4) or under Residuary Tariff item No.68 of Central Excise Tariff.

3. The appellant imported Rough Ophthalmic Blanks and was called upon to pay counter-vailing duty. which was paid. The Appellate Collector of Customs, Mumbai in another appeal held that Rough Ophthalmic Blanks could be charged to duty only under Residuary Tariff item No. 68. The appellant, therefore applied to the Assistant Collector of Customs ( Incharge of Refund ), Madras claiming refund of the above counter-vailing duty, which was rejected. The appeal and the review filed by the appellant were also dismissed. Thereafter, the appellant filed the appeal before the Customs, Excise and Gold (Control) Appellate Tribunal, New Delhi. The Tribunal heard the appeal filed by the appellant along with other appeals and dismissed the appeal of the appellant by the impugned judgment dated l.7.1986.

4. The facts are not disputed that Rough Ophthalmic Bla

















Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top