S.RAJENDRA BABU, D.P.MOHAPATRA, DORAISWAMY RAJU, G.B.PATTANAIK, SHIVARAJ V.PATIL
Kishan Prakash Sharma – Appellant
Versus
Union Of India – Respondent
JUDGMENT
Rajendra Babu, J.-The genesis of dispute in these matters is embedded in the various schemes framed under the General Insurance Business (Nationalisation) Act, 1972 (Act 57 of 1972) as amended from time to time (hereinafter referred to as the Act ).
2. The Preamble to the Act explains the purpose of the Act as to provide for the acquisition and transfer of shares in the Indian insurance companies and undertakings of other insurers in order to serve better the needs of the economy in securing development of general insurance business in the best interest of the community and to ensure that the operation of the economic system does not result in concentration of wealth to the common detriment for the regulation and control of such business and for matter connected therewith or incidental thereto. Section 2 declared that it was for giving effect to the policy of the State towards securing the principles specified in Article 39(c) of the Constitution and under Section 3(a) acquiring company has been defined as any Indian insurance company and where a scheme had been framed involving the merger of one or more insurance companies in another or amalgamation of two or more such
A.V. Nachane & Anr. v. Union of India & Anr.
S.S. Dola & Ors. v. B.D. Sardana & Ors.
New Bank of India Employees Union & Anr. v. Union of India & Ors.
Process Technicians & Analysts Union v. Union of India & Ors.
Ajay Kumar Banerjee v. Union of India
Kasturi Lal Lakshmi Reddy v. State of Jammu and Kashmir & Anr.
National Textile Workers Union etc. v. P.R. Ramkrishnan & Ors.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.