SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1984 Supreme(SC) 90

SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
Y.V. CHANDRACHUD, CJI., R.S. PATHAK AND SABYASACHI MUKHARJI, JJ.
Ajay Kumar Banerjee and others, Petitioners
Versus
Union of India and others, Respondents.
Writ Petns. Nos. 5370-74 and 5434-37 of 1980
Decided on 21-3-1984.
AND
Umed Singh and others, Petitioners
Versus
Union of India and others, Respondents.
Advocates appeared
 
Mr. M. K. Ramamurthi, Sr. Advocate, Mr. J. Ramamurthi and Miss R. Vaigai, Advocates, (in WPs. Nos. 5370-74 of 1980), Mr. R. K. Garg, Sr. Advocate, Mr. V. J. Francis, Advocate with him, (in W. P. No. 5434 of 1980), for Petitioners; M/s. J. P. Cama, Advocate and Mukul Mudgal, Advocate, for Intervener in W. Ps. Nos. 5370-74 of 1980; Mr. K. Parasaran, Attorney General, Mr. K. Banerjee, Addl. Solicitor, General, Miss A. Subhashini and Mr. C. V. Subba Rao, Advocates, for the Respondent (Union of India); Mr. P. R. Mridul, Sr. Advocate, M/s. O. C. Mathur, S. Sukumaran, D. N. Mishra and Miss Meera Mathur, Advocates with him for Respondent No. 2 in W. Ps. Nos. 5370-74 and 5434 of 1980, Mr. Hemant Sharma and Mrs. Indu Sharma, Advocates, for the Respondents in W. Ps. Nos. 5370-74; M/s. Vineet Kumar, Lalit Bhasin, Vinay Bhasin and Miss Arshi Singh, Advocates for Respondents Nos. 3 to 6 in W. Ps. Nos. 5434 and 5370-74 of 1980; Mr. Ambrish Kumar, Advocate, for Intervener in W. P. No. 5970 of 1980; Mr. Chandidas Sinha, Interevener-in-person in W. Ps. Nos. 5370-74 of 1980.

Advocates:
A.Subhashini, AMBRISH KUMAR, ARSHI SINGH, C.V.SUBBA RAO, CHANDIDAS SINHA, D.N.Mishra, HEMANT SHARMA, Indu Sharma, J.P.CAMA, J.RAMAMURTHY, K.PARASARAN ATTORNEY, LALIT BHASIN, M.K.BANERJI, M.K.RAMAMURTHY, MIRA MATHUR, Mukul Mudgal, O.C.MATHUR, P.R.MRIDUL, R.K.GARG, R.VAIGAI, S.SUKUMARAN, V.J.Francis, VINAY BHASIN, VINIT KUMAR

Headnote:

Constitution of India, 1950 - Article 14. 19 (1) (g) 39 and 31 – General Insurance (Emergency Provisions) Act, 1971 - General Insurance Business (Nationalisation) Act, 1972 – Section 2 , 6, 8, 9, 10 ,16 and 17 - Insurance Companies - Acquisition and transfer of shares - Service of theft employees - Service of theft employees were governed by respective contracts of service between companies and employers - On Government of India assumed management of the general insurance companies under General Insurance (Emergency Provisions) Act, 1971 - General insurance business was nationalised by General Insurance Business (Nationalisation) Act, 1972 - Preamble of Act explains purpose of Act as to provide for acquisition and transfer of shares of Indian insurance companies and undertakings of other Insurers in order to serve better needs of economy in securing development of general insurance business in best interest of community and to ensure that operation of economic system does not result in concentration of wealth to common detriment, for regulation and control of such business and for matters connected therewith or incidental thereto - It was for giving effect to policy of State towards securing principles specified in Clause (c) of Article 39 of Constitution – Held, It was submitted that both historically as well as a matter of law, public sector undertakings being economic instrumentalities of State and discharging obligations which State have, employees of such undertakings in principle cannot be distinguished from employees in government services - Law need not apply to all persons in sense of having a universal application to all persons - A law can be sustained if it deals equally with people of well-defined class-employees of insurance companies as such and such a law is not open to charge of denial of equal protection on ground that it had no application to other persons - Operation of scheme has been restrained by order passed as interim order in these cases - Impugned scheme is therefore quashed and will not be given effect to - Parties will be at liberty to adjust their rights as if scheme had not been framed - Application for intervention is allowed - Let appropriate writs be issued quashing scheme - Will not prevent Government, if it so advised, to frame any appropriate legislation or make any appropriate amendment giving power to Central Government to frame any scheme as it considers fit and proper - In facts and circumstances of these cases and specially in view of fact that petitioners had themselves at one point of time wanted that new scheme be framed by Central Government, Court direct that parties will pay and bear their own costs in all these matters - Petitions allowed

JUDGMENT

SABYASACHI MUKHARJI, J.:— Them petitions under Article 32 of the Constitution are filed by The employees of the General Insurance Companies and the All India Insurance Employees Association. The respondents are, Union of India, the General Insurance Corporation of India and four General Insurance companies.

2. The petitioners challenge the Notification dated 30th September, 1990 of the Ministry of Finance (Department of Economic Affairs) (Insurance) introducing what is called General Insurance (Rationalisation and Revision of Pay Scales and Other Conditions of Service of Supervisory, Clerical and Subordinate Staff) Second Amendment Scheme, 1980 as being illigal and violative of their fundamental rights under Arts. 14. 19 (1) (g) and 31 of the Constitution of India.

3. Prior to 1972, there were 106 General Insurance companies - Indian and foreign. Conditions of service of theft employees were governed by the respective contracts of service between the companies and the employers. On 13th May, 1971, the Government of India assumed management of the general insurance companies under the General Insurance (Emergency Provisions) Act, 1971. The general insurance business was nationalised by the General Insurance Business (Nationalisation) Act, 1972 (Act 57 of 1972). The preamble of the Act explains the purpose of the Act as to provide for the acquisition and transfer of shares of Indian insurance companies and undertakings of other Insurers in order to serve better the needs of economy in securing development of general insurance business in the best interest of the community and to ensure that the operation of the economic system does not result in the concentration of wealth to the common detriment, for the regulation and control of such business and for matters connected therewith or incidental thereto.

4. Act 57 of 1972, by Section 2, declared that it was for giving effect to the policy of the State towards securing the principles specified in Clause (c) of Article 39 of the Constitution. Under Section 3 (a) of the Act, acquiring company has been defined as any Indian insurance company and, where a scheme had been framed involving the merger of one or more insurance companies in another or amalgamation of two or more such companies, means the Indian insurance company in which any other company has been merged or the company which has been framed as a result of the amalgamation.

5. Section 4 provides that on the appointed day all the shares in the capital of every Indian insurance company shall be transferred to and vested in the Central Government free of all trusts, liabilities and encumbrances affecting these.

6. Section 5 provides for transfer of the undertakings of other existing insurers. Section 6 provides for the effect of transfer, of undertakings. Section 8 provides for the Provident Fund, superannuation, welfare or any other fund existing. Section 9 stipulates that Central Government shall form a Government company in accordance with the provisions of the companies Act, to be known as the General Insurance Corporation of India for the purpose of superintending, controlling and carrying on the business of general insurance. Section 10 stipulates that all shares in the capital of every Indian insurance company which shall stand transferred to and vested in the Central Government by virtue of Section 4 shall immediately after such vesting, stand transferred to and vested in the Corporation.

7. Chapter IV deals with the amounts to be paid for acquisition and as such we are not concerned in this case with that chapter in view of the controversy involved.

8. Chapter V of the aforesaid Act deals with "Scheme for reorganisation of general insurance business". Sections 16 and 17 of the Act in this chapter are as follows :

"16. (1) If the Central Government is of opinion that for the more efficient carrying on of general insurance business it is necessary so to do, it may, by notification, frame one or more schemes providing f








































































Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top