SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2001 Supreme(SC) 525

S.N.PHUKAN, S.S.M.QUADRI
East India Hotels – Appellant
Versus
Agra Development Authority – Respondent


JUDGMENT

Phukan, J.-Leave is granted.

2. In these appeals by special leave, appellant has assailed the judgment dated 1.10.1999 of the High Court of Allahabad passed in Civil Revision No. 106 of 1999. The appellant filed an application under Section 20 of the Arbitration Act, 1940 (for short the Act ) before Additional Civil Judge, Agra, which was allowed and the disputes between the parties were referred to arbitration. After the proceedings were concluded, the Umpire filed the award before the court on 13.11.1998, which was made rule of the court by order dated 25.02.1999. Being aggrieved, the respondent filed a revision petition before the High Court, which was allowed by the order under challenge, on the ground that no notice under sub-section (2) of Section 14 of the Act was served on the respondent.

3. To appreciate the contentions raised by the learned counsel for the parties, it is necessary to refer to the orders passed by the trial court on different dates:

"13.11.1998-Case was called for. The Parties are absent. The Award was filed by the Umpire Shri Jethanandji. Shri Prem Narain Agarwal, learned counsel for East India Hotels and Shri Suresh Chandra Gupta, learned counsel



































Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top