S.S.M.QUADRI, SHIVARAJ V.PATIL
State Of Kerala – Appellant
Versus
T. M. Chacko – Respondent
ORDER
The short question that arises in this appeal is whether Exhibits B-4 and A-8 do not contain any acknowledgement of the liability by the Appellant - Defendant, the State of Kerala, and if so is the suit filed by the Respondent - Plaintiff, for recovery of the bid amount paid to the Forest Department, barred by limitation under Article 47 of the Limitation Act, 1963?
2. Briefly stated, the following facts give rise to this question.
3. The Forest Department of the State of Kerala auctioned the forest produce in different coupes. The Respondent was the highest bidder of Sub-coupe No. VII of Coupe X and his bid of Rupees seventy five thousand was accepted on January 15, 1974. The Respondent paid Rs. 60,125/- towards the bid amount and other charges and a sum of Rupees twenty five thousand remained unpaid. The Respondent was to collect and remove the whole forest produce of the said coupe on or before March 31, 1974. Part of it only was collected and removed by him before February 21, 1974, when unfortunately fire broke out in the reserved forest which destroyed also the remaining forest produce of the Respondent s coupe. The Respondent made representations to the Forest Department
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.