SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2001 Supreme(SC) 945

A.P.MISRA, UMESH C.BANERJEE
Mattoo Devi – Appellant
Versus
Damodar Lal – Respondent


JUDGMENT

Banerjee, J.-Whilst an appeal has been taken against the judgment and decree passed by the learned Civil Judge, Jaipur in favour of Respondent No. 1 and 2 on deposit of Rs. 4657/- on the basis of the doctrine of Pre-emption in the court before a specified date and the High Court dismissed the appeal on the ground of there being no material for interference with the finding of the Civil Judge, Jaipur and a special leave petition was filed against the same (being Civil Appeal No. 5816/1994), the learned Advocate in support of the Appeal only restricted his submission on the issue of the principle of talab, as is known in Muslim Law.

2. The principle of talab in Mohammadan Law has three specific facets: the first being talab-e muwathaba : Talab in common parlance means and implies a demand and talab-e muwathaba literally means the demand of jumping . The idea is of a person jumping from his seat, as though startled by news of the sale (See in this context Wilson on Mohammadan Law). In Talab-e-muwathaba the pre-emptor must assert his claim immediately on hearing of sale though not before and law stands well settled that any unreasonable delay will be construed as an election n



































Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top