SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1954 Supreme(SC) 77

B. K. MUKHERJEE, M. C. MAHAJAN, N. H. BHAGWATI, T. L. VENKATARAMA AYYAR, VIVIAN BOSE
Audh Behari Singh – Appellant
Versus
Gajadhar Jaipuria – Respondent


Advocates:
ACHHRU RAM, C.K.DAFTARY, J.C.MUKHERJI, N.C.Sen, R.C.Prasad, S.P.SINHA, S.P.Varma, SHAUKAT HUSSAIN

Judgement Key Points

Key Points: - (!) - (!) - (!) - (!) - (!) - (!) - (!) - (!) - (!) - (!)

What is the legal nature and locus of the right of pre-emption in Banaras: is it an incident of property or a personal right?

What is the territorial scope of a local custom of pre-emption: does it bind only natives/domiciled persons or all property owners within the locality?

What are the conditions under which a local custom of pre-emption can be enforced against non-natives or outsiders, and can a landlord-tenant relationship affect the right of pre-emption?


Judgment

B. K. MUKHERJEA, J.

The plaintiff, who is the appellant before us, commenced the suit, out of which this appeal arises, in the court of the Civil Judge at Banaras (Being Original Suit No. 79 of 1941) for enforcement of his right of pre-emption in respect of an enclosed plot of land with certain structures upon it, situated within Mohalla Baradeo in the city of Banaras and bearing Municipal No. D37 48.

The premises in suit admittedly belonged to defendant 2 to 5 who are residents of Calcutta and they sold it by a conveyance executed on the 29th March 1941 and registered on the 3rd of April following, to defendant No. 1, also a resident of Calcutta, for the price of Rs. 7,000. The plaintiff is the owner of the two premises, to wit , premises Nos. D37/85 and D37/44, within the same Mohalla of the city of Banaras, which are in close proximity to the property in dispute and adjoin it on the northern and eastern sides respectively.

It is averred by the plaintiff that there is from very early time a custom prevalent in the city of Banaras according to which the plaintiff was entitled to claim pre-emption of the property in dispute on the ground of vicinage. It is said that as soon a

























































Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top