SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2001 Supreme(SC) 967

B.N.AGARWAL, G.B.PATTANAIK, S.N.PHUKAN
P. K. Pradhan – Appellant
Versus
State Of Sikkim Represented By The Central Bureau Of Investigation – Respondent


JUDGMENT

B.N. Agrawal, J.-In this appeal by Special Leave, order passed by Sikkim High Court, in Criminal Revision Application dismissing the same after holding that no sanction under Section 197 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1974 (hereinafter referred to as the "Code" ) is required for prosecution of the appellant and thereby upholding order passed by the Special Judge refusing to drop the prosecution in the absence of sanction under Section 197 of the Code, has been impugned.

2. A First Information Report was lodged for prosecution of Shri Nar Bahadur Bhandari, the then Chief Minister of Sikkim, and the appellant who was the then Secretary of Rural Development Department, Government of Sikkim, besides certain contractors under Sections 120-B of the Indian Penal Code read with Section 5(2) read with Section 5(1)(d) of the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1947 (hereinafter referred to as the "1947 Act") which correspond to Section 13(2) read with Section 13(1)(d) of the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 (hereinafter referred to as the "1988 Act") and the prosecution case, in short, was that during the year 1983-84, the State Cabinet of Sikkim decided to implement 36 Rural Water Su



























Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top