SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2001 Supreme(SC) 705

A.R.MISRA, UMESH C.BANERJEE
Jagdeep Singh – Appellant
Versus
Swapna Singh – Respondent


ORDER

This is a case with reference to the custody of the child for which this Court passed the order on 24th January, 2001 which is quoted hereunder:

"Heard learned counsel for the parties. The question is about the custody of the child, a boy at present of about 10 years old, who, at present, is in the custody of the mother. We at this juncture would not like to dispose of the matter finally but give a chance for a congenial atmosphere, if possible for the child returning to the father in terms of the decree passed. To start with we consider, after hearing counsel for the parties, that both the parents should meet at a common place for lunch along with the child for at least two hours for the next eight weeks on every Sunday at 1 P.M. at India Habitat Centre. During that period and during this interregnum till this Court takes up the matter, if a situation is created and the child agrees, the mother should have no objection that the child may go for sometime with the father also. However, we want to make it clear that no force should be applied for the said purpose. Even the period of two hours which we have fixed as a minimum period but if both the parties want to stay longer then













Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top