SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2001 Supreme(SC) 1221

ASHOK BHAN, S.P.BHARUCHA, Y.K.SABHARWAL
Thapar Institute Of Engineering And Technology – Appellant
Versus
Gagandeep Sharma – Respondent


JUDGMENT

Y.K. Sabharwal, J.-Respondent Nos.1 and 2 in this appeal were admitted to four year Bachelor of Engineering course in Thapar Institute of Engineering and Technology in the academic year 1997-98. The said Institute and its Director are appellants before us. Their challenge is to the judgment of the Division Bench of the High Court. The High Court, by the impugned judgment, reversing the judgment of the learned Single Judge, has declared that the respondents should be deemed to have passed the first year of their respective course. Accordingly, the appellants were directed to take immediate steps for allowing the respondents to prosecute their studies in the second year.

2. During the academic year 1997-98, Clause 17(a) of Schedule I of Academic Regulations governing the appellant-Institute required a student of the first year to repeat the examination if he fails to secure specified credits and/or specified grade and on inability to secure specified grade after repeating, to leave the Institution. The relevant part of Clause 17(a) at the material time in the academic year 1997-98 was as follows :

"17(a) A student will be required to repeat first year if (i) he fails to earn
































Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top