SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2001 Supreme(SC) 1285

D.P.MOHAPATRA, K.G.BALAKRISHNAN
Baldev Raj Taneja – Appellant
Versus
Bimal Kumar Kejriwal (Huf) – Respondent


ORDER

This Special Leave Petition has been filed by the complainant against the revisional order dated 21st March, 1997 of the High Court of Calcutta in Criminal Revision No. 194 of 1997 in which the learned single Judge (Justice S.K. Tiwari) while confirming the order of the learned Magistrate refusing to take cognizance of the offence under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, observed that the learned Magistrate should have taken cognizance of the offence punishable under Section 420 IPC and set aside the order and directed the learned Magistrate to hold further enquiry into the complaint. The SLP is delayed by 1233 days. The inordinate delay in filing the SLP has not been satisfactorily explained. Therefore, the SLP is dismissed on the ground of delay.

(N.K.R.) SLP dismissed on ground of delay.

**************

Parallel Citations of other Journals :

Baldev Raj Taneja v. Bimal Kumar Kejriwal (HUF), 2001(7) Supreme 82 : 2001 (7) JT 613 : 2001 (4) All.Crl.L.R. 166

00021

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top