SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2001 Supreme(SC) 1609

SHIVARAJ V.PATIL, D.P.MOHAPATRA
N. S. S. Narayana Sarma – Appellant
Versus
Goldstone Exports Private LTD. – Respondent


JUDGMENT

D.P. Mohapatra, J.-Leave is granted in all the SLPs.

2. The judgment rendered by a Division Bench of the Andhra Pradesh High Court on 10th November, 1998 disposing of a batch of appeals filed under Clause 15 of the Letter Patent, against the judgment of a single Judge is under challenge in these appeals. Since common questions of fact and law were raised by the parties in all the cases the High Court disposed of the appeals by a common judgment. The dispute relates to a property extending over 196.20 guntas under Survey No. 172 of Hydernagar village. The contest is between two sets of transferees of the property, while the appellants claim to be transferees of holders of pattas issued in their favour by the Pygah Committee of Nawab Khurshed Jah Pygah, the respondents trace their title to transfers by some decree-holders in the suit. The objections filed by the appellants under Order 21 Rule 99 read with Rule 101 of the Civil Procedure Code (for shore the CPC ) having been dismissed by the High Court as non-maintainable, the appellants are before this Court assailing the judgment of the High Court.

3. The genesis of the proceedings leading to the present cases shorn of unnec



































Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top