SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2001 Supreme(SC) 7

B.N.KIRPAL, D.P.MOHAPATRA, R.P.SETHI
Delhi Bar Association: Som Nath: Labour Law Association – Appellant
Versus
Union Of India: Union Of India: Registrar, Delhi High Court – Respondent


ORDER

Mr. Mukul Rohtagi, learned Addl. Solicitor General, brings to our notice that there is an order of stay passed by this Court which is hindering the recruitment of the Judicial Officers. Hopefully, that petition will be disposed of at an early date and/or the interim orders varied so as to permit recruitment to be made to the Delhi Judicial Service.

2. Affidavits have been filed on behalf of the Union of India and the Delhi High Court. Affidavits by the Bar Associations and the Delhi Government be filed within two weeks. Rejoinder, if any, be filed within two weeks thereafter.

3. Mr. Rohtagi also informs us that in the last recruitment only 6 persons were selected though 40 vacancies were advertised. It is indeed surprising that not more than 6 persons were regarded as being of suitable material, so to say, to be appointed as Judges. What has to be seen is the potential in the candidate.

4. Whether a person is intelligent and will in due course of time become a good Judge. It may not be necessary for him to be academically brilliant or knowing all the law at the time when the process of selection is under-taken. What has to be seen is, as we have already observed, whether the ca








Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top