S.N.VARIAVA, S.RAJENDRA BABU
State Of Haryana – Appellant
Versus
Hitkari Potteries LTD. – Respondent
ORDER
An application was made by respondent No. 1 (hereinafter referred to as the respondent) under Section 25-O of the Industrial Disputes Act (for short the Act ) for permission to close down the company on 15.1.1998. On 2.4.1998 a letter was sent by on behalf of the Government to the respondent to the effect that the application filed by it is defective in certain aspects and is hence rejected.
2. Under Section 24-O (3) of the Act if Government does not communicate the order granting or refusing to grant permission to the employer within a period of 60 days from the date on which such application is made, permission applied shall be deemed to have been granted on the expiration of the said period of 60 days.
3. In the present case the application was not disposed of within a period of 60 days from 15.1.1998 and a communication was sent only long after expiry of that period on 2.4.1998. In that view of the matter the view taken by the High Court that necessary permission as contemplated under the provisions of Section 24-O of the Act is deemed to have been granted appears to us to be correct and certain provisions have been made by the High Court in its order regarding protection o
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.