SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2002 Supreme(SC) 88

R.C.LAHOTI, BRIJESH KUMAR
Paul George – Appellant
Versus
State – Respondent


JUDGMENT

Brijesh Kumar, J.-Leave granted. Heard learned counsel for the parties.

2. This is an appeal against the order dated September 25, 2001 passed by the Delhi High Court, dismissing Criminal Revision No. 555 of 2001 preferred by the appellant, passing the following order :

"I have heard the learned counsel for the petitioner. I find no illegality, impropriety or jurisdictional error in the judgment under challenge.

Dismissed"

3. The appellant has been convicted under Section 279 read with Section 304A IPC and sentenced to a fine of Rs.1,000/-, in default simple imprisonment for a period of ten days, on the first count and to simple imprisonment for nine months and a fine of Rs. 4,000/- in default one month s further simple imprisonment, on the latter count. The appeal preferred against conviction and the sentence was dismissed as well as the revision.

4. The learned counsel for the appellant has vehemently urged that the criminal revision has been dismissed by the High Court by means of a non-speaking order. It indicates no reasons to reject the pleas raised by the appellant nor there is any indication of application of mind while deciding the revision.

5. It is submitted that inte











Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top