SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2002 Supreme(SC) 297

B.N.AGARWAL, M.B.SHAH
Mahendra Pal – Appellant
Versus
Ram Dass Malanger – Respondent


JUDGMENT

Shah, J.-This appeal under Section 116-A of the Representation of the People Act, 1951 (hereinafter referred to as "the Act") is filed against the final judgment and order dated 4.5.2001 passed by the High Court of Himachal Pradesh at Shimla in Election Petition No. 1 of 1998.

2. The election petition was filed by the appellant for setting aside the election of respondent No. 1. It is submitted that the appellant contested the election as a candidate sponsored by the Indian National Congress while respondent No. 1 contested the election as candidate sponsored by the Bhartiya Janta Party. Appellant secured 11,657 votes and respondent No. 1 secured 11,660 votes. Therefore, respondent No. 1 was declared elected by a margin of three votes only. It was alleged that the said election result was vitiated because of improper reception of invalid votes in favour of respondent No. 1 and improper rejection of valid votes in favour of appellant. It was also contended that many irregularities were committed during the course of counting which had materially affected the result of election insofar as the returned candidate is concerned. It was pointed out that total number of ballot paper























Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top