KULDIP SINGH, M. H. KANIA
Satyanarain Dudhani – Appellant
Versus
Uday Kumar Singh – Respondent
JUDGMENT
KULDIP SINGH, J.:—We pronounced our conclusions in this appeal on January 23, 1990 in the following terms:-
"After hearing the arguments we reserved judgment in this election appeal. The Election Commission has announced fresh elections to the Bihar Legislative Assembly. There is thus an urgency to announce the judgment. For the reasons to be recorded later on we allow the appeal with costs and set aside the order of the High Court dated March 30, 1988 ordering recount and allowing inspection of ballot papers. As a consequence the order of the High Court dated December 6, 1988 declaring the election of the appellant to Tundi Assembly Constituency as void and declaring respondent Uday Kumar Singh as duly elected is also set aside. The election petition filed by Shri Udai Kumar Singh challenging the election of the appellant Shri Satyanarain Dudhani is dismissed with costs. We quantify the costs as Rs. 7000/-".
2. We now proceed to give our reasons for the conclusions quoted above.
3. The appellant contested election to the Bihar Assembly Constituency from Tundi Constituency. He was declared elected on March 7, 1985 by defeating his nearest rival Uday Kumar Singh by a narrow m
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.