SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2002 Supreme(SC) 476

D.P.MOHAPATRA, P.VENKATARAMA REDDI
Kapil Kumar – Appellant
Versus
Kudrat Ali – Respondent


JUDGMENT

P. Venkatarama Reddi, J.-Leave granted.

2. In this appeal by Special leave, the only question that is canvassed before us is about the adequacy of compensation awarded by High Court to the appellant - a minor, who was injured in a bus accident on 5.11.1994. The bus belonged to the second respondent and was insured with the 3rd respondent. At the time of the accident the appellant - a student was aged nine years. The Motor Accident Claim Tribunal, Ratlam, awarded a sum of Rs. 25,000/- towards compensation with interest at the rate of 12% p.a. from the date of petition. On appeal, the High Court enhanced the compensation to Rs. 35,000/-. A letters Patent Appeal filed against that order, was summarily dismissed by the impugned order dated 8.7.1999. The amount of compensation awarded by the High Court under different heads is as follows :-

On account of disability suffered by the victim as a result of grievous injury caused to his right hand Rs. 20,000/- (increased by Rs. 5,000/-). For pain and suffering Rs.5,000/- (increased by Rs. 1,500/-).

Travel and stay expenses of the victim and his attendant for going to Baroda for treatment Rs. 5,000/-.

3. It is contended that the compensa






Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top