RUMA PAL, S.RAJENDRA BABU
Union Of India – Appellant
Versus
Shree Gajanan Maharaj Sansthan – Respondent
JUDGMENT
Rajendra Babu, J.-These are three matters, two of which are appeals arising out of orders made by two different High Courts and the third matter is a writ petition filed by the respondent (Shree Gajanan Maharaj Sansthan) in Civil Appeal No. 2727/1998 in this Court directly under Article 32 of the Constitution.
Civil Appeal No. 2727/1998
2. The respondent in this appeal registered as a charitable trust under the Bombay Public Trust Act filed a writ petition before the Bombay High Court, Nagpur Bench, contending that Section 2(j) of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 [hereinafter referred to as the Act ] provides for definition of the expression "industry"; that this Court interpreted the said expression in Bangalore Water Supply & Sewerage Board vs. A. Rajappa & Ors., 1978(2) SCC 213; that separate judgments were rendered by Beg, C.J., Chandrachud, C.J. And Bhagwati, Krishna Iyer and Desai, JJ. together, while Jaswant Singh and Tulzapurkar, JJ. partially dissented; that they explained the definition of the expression "industry" in the Act; that all of them are of the view that the matter should be clarified by the Legislature by a suitable amendment; that the said definition
Bangalore Water Supply & Sewerage Board v. A. Rajappa & Ors.
Suman Gupta & Ors. v. State of J & K & Ors.
Consumer Action Group & Anr. v. State of T.N. & Ors.
Agricultural Produce Market Committee v. Ashok Harikuni & Anr.
Aeltemesh Rein v. Union of India & Ors.
A.K. Roy v. Union of India & Ors.
Rajnarain Singh v. The Chairman, Patna Administration Committee, Patna & Anr.
Hamdard Dawakhana (Wakf) Lal Kuan, Delhi & Anr. v. Union of India & Ors.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.