SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2002 Supreme(SC) 720

R.C.LAHOTI, BRIJESH KUMAR
Podapati Malakondaiah – Appellant
Versus
State Of A. P. – Respondent


JUDGMENT

R.C. Lahoti, J.-The accused-appellant has been held guilty of an offence punishable under Section 302 IPC and sentenced to imprisonment for life and also to pay a fine of Rs. 2000/- and in default to undergo simple imprisonment for six months by the Trial Court. The conviction and sentence have been maintained by the High Court. The accused has filed this appeal by special leave.

2. The charge found proved against the accused-appellant is of causing the death of one Pedapati Basavaiah on 11.9.1993 at 3.30 p.m. in village Kondamudupalem.

3. The deceased was the uncle of the accused. There are four eye-witnesses to the incident. PW 1, an eye-witness, is brother-in-law of the deceased. PW 2, PW 3 and PW 7, the three other eye-witnesses are independent eye-witnesses being villagers having their land in the vicinity of the scene of occurrence and not related to either the accused or the deceased. The deceased had executed a deed of settlement in favour of the accused in respect of certain property belonging to the deceased. Such settlement was not to the liking of PW 5, the daughter of the deceased. She had filed a civil suit laying challenge to the validity of the deed of settlem











Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top