SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2001 Supreme(SC) 301

K.T.THOMAS, R.P.SETHI
Dharmendra Chandulal Patel – Appellant
Versus
State Of Gujarat – Respondent


ORDER

Leave granted.

2. The appellant is the third accused in the case where deceased Arvindbhai Patel was short dead. The appellant is the son-in-law of first accused - Amaratbhai Bholidas Patel. The allegation is that pursuant to series of altercations and skirmishes the father (Amrit Lal) had shot his son (deceased) dead. When second accused Virendra Amrutbhai Patel moved for bail we granted an order by imposing some conditions on him as per order dated 27.11.2000 in Criminal Appeal No.1016 of 2000. The application for bail was opposed by the State and hence the High Court refused bail as per the impugned order.

3. Appellant was arrested on 24-2-2000 and he is continuing in jail till now. The role attributed to this appellant is that he made an oral exhortation. Contentions have been advanced by Mr. R.K. Jain, learned senior Counsel in favour of releasing the appellant on bail since he is already under incarceration for a long period. The State as well as the widow of the deceased opposed the application before us through their respective Counsel engaged. We refrain from expressing any comment on the merits of the contentions as we did while passing the order in Criminal Appeal No.













Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top