SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2002 Supreme(SC) 61

P.VENKATARAMA REDDI, D.P.MOHAPATRA
Ram Niwas Gupta – Appellant
Versus
Mumtaz Hasan – Respondent


ORDER

The plaintiff in the suit for specific performance of the agreement of sale of immovable property, filed this appeal assailing the judgment passed by the Allahabad High Court in F.A. No. 486 of 1980 in which the High Court set aside the judgment of the trial court, decreed the suit in part and granted the alternative relief sought in the plaint for refund of the consideration paid and awarded a sum of Rs. 5000/- with interest as damages to the plaintiff. The High Court declined to grant the plaintiff s prayer for specific performance of the agreement of sale.

2. The appellant filed the Suit No. 123 of 1978 in the court of civil judge, Saharanpur on 1.6.1978, seeking a decree of specific performance of the agreement of sale of the suit property or in the alternative for a decree for refund of the consideration money and damages of Rs. 5000/- and other consequential reliefs.

3. The case of the plaintiff shortly stated is that he had entered into an agreement with the defendant on 10th of January, 1975 for sale of the suit property in his favour for a consideration of Rs. 31,350/- with the stipulation inter alia that the defendant will take steps for obtaining permission for sale o

















Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top