M.B.SHAH, DORAISWAMY RAJU, S.N.VARIAVA, D.M.DHARMADHIKARI
S. Amarjit Singh Kalra (dead) by LRs. – Appellant
Versus
Pramod Gupta (dead) by LRs. – Respondent
Judgment
D. Raju, J.—Special leave granted in S.L.P. (C) Nos. 11914-11915 of 1991.
2. On 14.8.2002, the Court allowed the applications filed in C.A. Nos. 1029 -1030 of 1992 and Civil Appeals arising out of S.L.P. (C) Nos. 11914-11915 of 1991 for substitution and condonation of delay in filing the applications for substitution in respect of some of the respondents, who died during the pendency of these appeals. In the light of the above, all other applications filed for substitution and condonation of delay of one or the other parties in the above matters by the respective counsel for the appellants are also allowed. After the hearing was completed and orders have been reserved, it appears that the heirs of one Late Sultan Singh alias Ishwar Singh claiming to be interested in the compensation but admittedly was not a party (the late Sultan Singh himself) either before the Reference Court or the High Court, have filed applications to be impleaded as necessary parties. Since, the predecessor-in-interest of the applicants was himself not a part at any stage of the proceedings before the Courts below, we see no justification to entertain their claim for coming on record at this stage
Harihar Prasad Singh & Ors. v. Balmiki Prasad Singh & Ors.
The State of Punjab v. Nathu Ram
Kanakrathanammal v. V.S. Loganotha Muddier & Anr.
Jahar Roy (dead through LRs.) & Anr. v. Premji Bhimji Mansata & Anr.
Harihar Prasad Singh & Ors. v. Balmiki Prasad Singh & Ors.
Saguja Transport Service v. State Transport Appellate Tribunal, M.P. Gwarllor & Ors.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.