SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2003 Supreme(SC) 61

M.B.SHAH, ARUN KUMAR
U. Dhar – Appellant
Versus
State Of Jharkhand – Respondent


JUDGMENT

Arun Kumar. J.-

Crl. A. No. 70 of 2003 @ SLP (Crl.) No. 2654 of 2002:

Leave granted.

2. This Appeal is filed by U. Dhar, Managing Director and Mr. Asis Ray, Vice President (Operation), both of Tata Construction & Project Ltd. against an order dated 3rd May, 2002 passed by the High Court of Jharkhand in Crl. M.P No.4780/2001 whereby the High Court dismissed the petition filed by the appellant herein for quashing an order dated 19th June, 2001 whereby cognizance was taken of offence against the appellants under Sections 403, 406, 420 and 120B of Indian Penal Code by the learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Bokaro.

3. Briefly, the facts are that Bokaro Steel Plant, a unit of Steel Authority of India Limited (for short, SAIL) awarded a contract to M/s. Tata Iron & Steel Co. Ltd. (for short, TISCO), Growth Shop for certain works. TISCO growth shop completed supply part of the work and erection part of the work was entrusted by it to M/s. Tata Construction & Projects Ltd. (for snort TCPL). TCPL in turn issued Tender Enquiry and awarded the work to M/s. Singh Construction Co., the complainant. According to the complainant after completing the work it demanded payment of the balance a














Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top