JUDGMENT

Y.K. Sabharwal, J.-By the impugned judgment and order dated 31st March, 1993, the High Court has come to the conclusion that the appellant Radha Mohan Lal (Criminal Appeal No. 445/93) and his advocate, appellant Sualal Yadav (Criminal Appeal No. 449/93) have committed the contempt of court. Both have been sentenced to three months simple imprisonment each besides fine of Rs. 1,000/- each and in default of payment of fine, to further suffer simple imprisonment for 15 days.

2. The basis for initiation and punishment for contempt of court is the averment made in para 4 of the application dated 18th September, 1991 that had been filed before a learned Single Judge of the High Court in a civil revision petition which was listed before the learned Judge. The said para 4 reads as under:

"That apart from it, the undersigned has been informed by his client -Shri Radha Mohan Lal Vakil Ex. Chairman of the Municipal Council, Jaipur, that he along with other non-petitioners have moved a complaint in writing against Hon ble Shri R.S. Kejriwal to the Hon ble Chief Justice requesting him to list the above revision before a Bench of which Hon ble Shri R.S. Kejriwal is not a member as they