SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2003 Supreme(SC) 205

SHIVARAJ V.PATIL, ARIJIT PASAYAT
Chanchal Goyal – Appellant
Versus
State Of Rajasthan – Respondent


JUDGMENT

Arijit Pasayat, J.-The only point involved in this appeal is whether the appellant s termination from service is in order. Factual scenario which is almost undisputed is as follows:-

2. The appellant was appointed by the Local Self - Government Department. Government of Rajasthan by order of appointment dated 27-11-1974, and posted as Lady Doctor under the Municipal Council, Ganganagar. There was a stipulation in the order of appointment that she was being posted purely on temporary basis for the period of six months or till the candidate selected by the Rajasthan Public Service Commission (hereinafter referred to as the Service Commission ) is available, which is earlier. The working period of the appellant continued to be extended. The appointment was made in exercise of powers conferred under Section 308 of the Rajasthan Municipalities Act, 1959 (in short the Act ) read with Rules 26 and 27 of the Rajasthan Municipal Service Rules, 1963 (in short the Rules ). Though the appellant was selected by the Service Commission in October 1976 and August 1982 she did not join pursuant to such selection and continued on the basis of the orders of extension issued by the Local Se







































Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top