SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2003 Supreme(SC) 386

SHIVARAJ V.PATIL, ARIJIT PASAYAT
M. D. ,U. P. Land Development Corporation – Appellant
Versus
Amar Singh – Respondent


ORDER

This appeal is directed against the order of the Division Bench of the High Court. In short and substance, the facts leading to filing of this appeal are:

The appellant-Corporation took a decision to prepare a panel of 25 posts of Assistant Project Managers. Pursuant to the said decision the Corporation wrote a letter to the Vice Chancellor, Agricultural University on 9-11-1990 seeking names of B.Sc. (Agr.) graduates for the purpose. Thereafter, letters were issued to the candidates for the purpose of training of one year for the Million Wells Scheme with a fixed stipend of Rs. 1200/- per month. The State Government on 22-2-1993 gave sanction for creation of 30 new and temporary posts of Assistant Manager under a new World Bank Project, i.e., U.P. Sodic Land Reclamation Project. The candidates who were selected, were thereafter appointed as Assistant Managers after serving for sometime. Out of 32 candidates selected 6 persons approached the High Court by filing a Writ Petition seeking regularisation of their services with a grant of regular pay-scales. The learned Single Judge allowed the Writ Petition and gave direction to regularise their services and also to grant pay-scal






























Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top